Imtiaz Shaik examines why automation can fall short without the right QA mindset, showing how integrating quality assurance early in DevOps pipelines leads to more resilient, user-focused software.

Why Automation Fails Without the Right QA Mindset

Author: Imtiaz Shaik

Automation is a central part of modern DevOps, enabling teams to achieve faster release cycles and continuous delivery. Companies leveraging automation in their delivery process can experience up to 60% faster releases compared to those using manual testing. However, simply introducing automation does not guarantee improved quality. Without embedding quality assurance (QA) thinking into every step, speed can backfire—leading to undetected issues and reduced user satisfaction.

QA as a Continuous Partner

The traditional approach relegated QA to the final phase of the development cycle. In contrast, high-performing teams now position QA as an integral part of the entire process. QA professionals work closely with product owners and developers from day one, ensuring clear understanding of requirements, architectural decisions, and visibility across deployment stages. Key roles for QA include:

Designing and managing automated tests within CI/CD pipelines
Emphasizing risk-based testing
Collaborating to ensure that quality is woven throughout the workflow

This evolution sees QA professionals acting as collaborative partners, strategic advisors, and critical thinkers, spotting problems early to reduce rework and minimize reactive firefighting.

The Value of the QA Mindset

Speed-focused teams sometimes fall into a “developmental mindset,” tracking code coverage and scripting tests to meet minimum requirements. However, this often leads to missed risks and testing gaps. A true QA mindset is:

Exploratory and skeptical: Proactively seeks out how, where, and why things might fail
User-focused: Considers the real impact on users, not just whether the software meets requirements
Strategic: Designs tests to anticipate edge cases and reflect real-world usage

Organizations with this approach experience earlier defect detection, fewer incidents in production, and overall smoother releases.

Automation’s Limitations

Automation can only check what it’s told. Poorly understood requirements or inflexible, outdated scripts mean automated tests may flag “all clear” while real issues remain unresolved. Imtiaz Shaik highlights examples where:

Automation missed business logic and regulatory compliance, caught only by manual review
Brittle automation could not keep pace with UI or logic changes
Test coverage gaps emerged due to lack of ongoing QA involvement

The Irreplaceable Human Element

Human-driven testing continues to play a vital role in areas that automation struggles with—UI/UX validation, complex edge cases, and exploratory scenarios. Hybrid strategies, combining automated regression with targeted manual exploration, enable stable and creative test pipelines.

QA professionals translate business requirements into actionable, risk-aware testing scenarios, bridging the gap between development and business teams. Their unique insights keep everyone aligned on what delivers real value to users and the business.

Tips to Foster the Right QA Mindset

Integrate QA early: Bring QA into the project from the very start
Adopt risk-based, user-focused testing: Go beyond pass/fail checks and consider the broader impact
Build maintainable and adaptable automation: Design scripts for flexibility
Blend automation with human testing: Let each do what it does best—automation for routine validation, people for new features and exploratory tests

Conclusion

Automation is powerful, but only as smart as the mindset that guides it. By embedding quality assurance thinking throughout your delivery pipeline, you ensure that speed, stability, and true user value go hand in hand.

This post appeared first on “DevOps Blog”. Read the entire article here